|
|
|
|
 |
| Our
Evolutionary Inheritance |
 |
|
|
|
The prefrontal cortex
seems to contain an especially large number of long
axons, which can make connections between various
regions of the cortex that are far from one another. The
larger the prefrontal cortex, the more long axons it contains,
and the more likely consciousness is to emerge. Brain imaging
also shows that the prefrontal cortex is highly active when
tasks of memorization and deductive reasoning are being performed. |
Many researchers, such
as anthropologist Robin Dunbar, say that the main selective
pressure that has favoured the growth of the neocortex in
primates has been the growing complexity of their
social groups. According to Dunbar, the dramatic
increase in the size of the prefrontal cortex (compared with
the various sensory cortexes, for example) is explained by
the properties of this frontal part of the brain, which have
a great deal to do with social skills.
Though primates are not capable of elaborate systems of ethics,
they do display many moral behaviours, according to Dunbar.
These behaviours of mutual
assistance and co-operation require them to trade short-term
costs for long-term gain, even though this may make them vulnerable
to exploitation by more selfish members of their society.
That is why morality may be advantageous from an evolutionary
standpoint. It can strengthen group cohesion and provide
a harmonious social climate that benefits the greatest number
of individuals. And what part of the brain performs the cognitive
functions needed to establish such a climate by restraining
selfish tendencies? The prefrontal cortex.
|
A study was conducted
of men who had antisocial personality disorder, characterized
by irresponsible actions, cheating, impulsiveness and lack
of affect or remorse, and who all had committed violent crimes.
Images of their brains revealed that the neuronal volume
of their prefrontal cortexes was 11 to 14% lower than in
normal men.
The prefrontal cortex is recognized as playing an important
role in individuals’ moral sensibility and self-restraint.
The results of this study provide strong evidence for this
role, and raise some questions about the notion of free will
that is the basis for all law. |
|
|
| THE EVOLUTIONARY
LAYERS OF THE HUMAN BRAIN |
|
The various species of vertebrates
are very similar in the way that their brains are organized.
For example, all vertebrates have a
forebrain, midbrain and hindbrain, within which are found
all the major neural systems that have evolved to perform functions
common to all species.
However, the various species also have areas of the brain that
have specialized in distinctive ways in response to the specific
constraints of their environments. The human brain is about three
times larger in volume than we would expect in a primate of comparable
size, and the proportions of its parts to one another are different
than in other primates. For instance, in humans, the olfactory
lobe is only 30% of the size it would be if it were in the same
proportion to the entire brain as in other primates. It follows
logically that if the human brain overall is nevertheless much
larger than would be expected in a primate our size, then some
of its other structures must be proportionately far larger. And
indeed, when we trace the brain’s evolution from fish to
amphibians to reptiles to mammals and finally to humans, we see
that the
parts of the brain that have grown the most in human beings are
in the neocortex, and more specifically the prefrontal cortex.

The prefrontal cortex is the most rostral
region of the cortex. In other species, it is dedicated to voluntary
motor control, but in primates, it has developed considerably.
For many years, scientists believed that humans’ unequalled
abilities for planning and abstract reasoning were attributable
to their having a more developed prefrontal cortex than other primates.
But studies conducted in the first few years
of the new millennium have called this idea into question. Earlier
studies had compared the human brain to those of other primates,
but had not included most of the great apes. In these more recent
studies, magnetic resonance imaging has been used to measure the
relative size of the prefrontal cortex in all species of great
apes, including humans. When this new method was applied to this
broader range of species, the relative size of the prefrontal cortex
was found to be almost the same in humans as in the great apes
who are our closest cousins (chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and
orangutans).
According to the authors of these recent
studies, humans’ superior abilities to anticipate and to
plan can more correctly be attributed to other specialized regions
of the cortex and to denser interconnections between the prefrontal
cortex and the rest of the brain. The main reason that the prefrontal
cortex is slightly larger relative to the rest of the brain in
humans than in most other primates is that humans have a larger
volume of white
matter in their prefrontal cortex. This white matter is composed
of myelin-covered
axons that communicate with other parts of the brain, thus
providing greater connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and
the rest of the brain than in other species.
The high,
straight forehead that characterizes modern humans, superceding
the prominent brow ridges of our ancestors, is due to the
expansion of the cortex, and especially the prefrontal cortex,
in our species.

1. Australopithecus robustus 2. Homo habilis 3. Homo
erectus
4. Homo sapiens neanderthalensis 5. Homo sapiens
sapiens |
This connectivity is essential for the proper
functioning of our working
memory, in which the prefrontal cortex plays an active role.
Working memory is involved in many of the cognitive abilities that
are so highly developed in humans, such as the abilities to retain
information while performing a task, to verify the relevance of
this information to the task in progress, and to keep the objective
of the task in mind at the same time. Patients who suffer severe
injuries to their prefrontal lobes can experience difficulties
in relating the past, present, and future and hence in planning
their actions. This phenomenon, known as “frontal syndrome”,
confirms the primary role that this part of the cortex plays in
anticipation and in choices of all sorts.
The recent expansion of the prefrontal cortex, together with the
increased plasticity and associative capacities of the neocortex,
thus seems to be the source of many of the most typically human
cognitive abilities.
Though an
increase in the
size of the brain does not automatically confer any evolutionary
advantage on the species concerned, it has been observed
that in the process of hominization, the hominid species
with smaller brains were gradually replaced by species with
larger ones.
Some inventive hypotheses have been advanced to explain
this phenomenon. For example, some theorists argue that the
greater associative capacities of individuals with larger
brains enabled them to make more unpredictable behavioural
responses. In turn, selective pressure would then have been
exerted on other members of their species to develop larger
brains so that they could better predict these responses — an
essential survival skill among social species. These larger
brains would then have generated even more unpredictable
behaviours. The positive feedback loop thus established would
have been responsible for this tendency toward increased
brain size in primates.
The concept of a positive feedback loop provides
another way of accounting for evolution’s apparent
tendency toward greater complexity. In this case, the selective
pressure is seen as being generated by the evolutionary changes
themselves. This pressure is also entirely dependent on the
particular context of the human evolutionary line, with its
highly developed social behaviours.
|
Close parallels can
be drawn between the way that the brain has evolved in our
species and way that it develops in an individual. In individuals,
just as in species, mutations can arise, and they can have
a significant impact on the adult’s morphology. Even
though it is the adult individual who has been subjected
to the selective pressure of the environment, it is that
individual’s genetic development program that will
eventually be selected and passed on to his or her descendants.
Many researchers think that the expansion of the neocortex
in general and the prefrontal cortex in particular might be
explained by mutations in a limited number of genes at an early
stage of development. These mutations would
have resulted in the duplication of certain areas of the cortex,
exactly as is observed for certain genes in the genome.
As in the case of genes, one of the possible advantages
of this duplication would be that one particular cortical
region could evolve rapidly while its duplicate continued
to perform the basic function originally assigned to it.
|
|
|